War and Peace

Puoi trovare questa recensione anche sul mio blog, La siepe di more

Ci sono due elementi che mi impediscono di amare alla follia Guerra e pace: il primo riguarda i personaggi, mentre il secondo ha a che fare con le idee di Tolstoj (e non solo perché ha scritto tipo duecento pagine su quanto fosse detestabile Napoleone: avremmo capito anche con meno pagine che non lo sopportava, ecco).

Sul primo punto, devo dire di essere una lettrice in cerca di personaggi ribelli: leggermi millequattrocento pagine di gente che si fa milioni di problemi nel cercare di aderire all’ideale che in quel momento le sembra il paradigma al quale aspirare mi ha fatto venire il latte alle ginocchia. Tra Pierre e Bolkonskij non so chi avrei strozzato più volentieri (e mi fa molto ridere il fatto che nell’introduzione alla mia edizione si affermi che Pierre è il personaggio che più di tutti attira le simpatie dellǝ lettorǝ).

Sulle idee di Tolstoj – manco a dirlo – ho trovato insopportabile, e a tratti addirittura ridicolo, il determinismo che permea Guerra e pace. Voglio dire, Pierre non ha sposato Hélène perché era scritto che doveva andare così; l’ha sposata perché è un coglione che dovrebbe smettere di usare il destino come scusa per giustificare qualunque bischerata gli capiti di fare.

In secondo luogo, la concezione delle donne di Tolstoj è terrificante. Lo so che è un romanzo dell’Ottocento e badabim e badabam, ma a volte la ragione non è sufficiente a farti passare il fastidio provato davanti a ciò che stai leggendo. Penso che il personaggio che ha attirato di più la mia simpatia sia Natasha: prima con la faccenda con Bolkonskij, che mi è sembrata molto surreale; poi con l’uomo che finisce per sposare – mamma mia, che tristezza.

Eppure, nonostante tutto questo, ho macinato pagine su pagine di Guerra e pace senza particolari difficoltà perché la capacità di Tolstoj di caratterizzare i suoi personaggi è tale da far passare in secondo piano ogni discrepanza e da farteli ricordare anche se sono una miriade. Quindi il mio consiglio è di leggerlo, senza paura per la mole (Tolstoj scorre come l’acqua) e senza temere i pippotti su Napoleone (che a una certa sembrano mattonate sulle dita dei piedi, ma poi finiscono, dai).

For many years, I have been working through a rather long list of literary classics in chronological order of publication. I have reached the late 1800s, and it just so happened that the start of 2021 coincided with La Guerre et la Paix, or War and Peace (1869) by Leo Tolstoy. Looking back, it seems like a completely unreasonable project for me to start the year with such a dense classic. This book spans more than 1600 pages and features more than 500 characters. Lockdown life demanded ambitious personal goal-setting, and so I did what I could to stay the course.

Every day, I opened my beautiful green paper edition of this novel and read a few short chapters. War and Peace is the historical and philosophical novel by excellence. It narrates the invasion of Russia by France, and alternates between scenes of military conflict and high society. The complex web of characters is made accessible by the serial format - very short chapters allow for a rapid pace reading of this long-winded novel.

It took me 4 months to read War and Peace - I started on January 15 and finished, with a great sigh of relief, on April 19. It was a ridiculously long and epic adventure. Of course, it was worth it! Like many Russian novels, War and Peace lends itself extraordinary well to the colder months - do read it in the winter.

So, War and Peace. It's a big one, for sure.

But I feel like it's a lot shorter than people think it is. War and Peace has become our archetypal "long book," but it's shorter than Les Miserables (which I read last year) and reads a lot faster. It's a book more on the scale of the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which is still long, but is also fairly widely read.

With that out of the way, let's get into it.

Russian Names

This is probably a common barrier to people understanding this book and others like it. In my case, I worked my way up to War and Peace by reading some of Dosteovsky's work: The Gambler, Crime and Punishment, and The Brothers Karamazov. At one point when I was reading Brothers K, it just clicked and I started to get how the names worked.

The narrative tends to either refer to characters by first name (and sometimes first plus the middle one, which is just the name of one of the parents with "vitch" or "ovna" tacked on) or by last name depending on the context.

I will say that it got a lot easier to keep track of the characters after the first quarter of the book because you start to see who's important and who isn't and can tell from their characters. For that first part, though, I'd recommend you have a chart or something where you write down each new character and who they are so you can reference it. I didn't do that, but I wished I had.

I do recommend you read some other, shorter, Russian literature before this one. I highly recommend Crime and Punishment, that was my favorite. It reads a bit slower than this, but it's also a lot shorter.

War Narrative and Philosophizing

One of the more annoying things to me was Tolstoy's constant philosophizing about the inevitability of events in a war and how the "leaders" of armies aren't really in control. It makes sense and is an interesting perspective, but it was repeated so many times. The entire Second Epilogue (12 chapters long) is about it. So yeah, that's one thing to brace yourself for.

I mean, if political commentary is your thing, you might enjoy it.

Characterization

So far I've been addressing hard things about the book, but that's not the case with this. The characterization was phenomenal. All of the characters had so many different layers and seemed extremely real.

And the development was fantastic. It was fascinating to watch all these dozens of characters growing and changing over the course of the book.

So yeah, this book is worth reading, if only for the characterization.

Overall Thoughts

Overall, this book was fantastic. There were, as I mentioned, some slow parts, but it was really well written and was actually a much easier read than I was led to expect.

Oh, and Tolstoy has got cliffhangers figured out. Once I picked it up to read a chapter or two and didn't put it down until hours later when I realized I'd read through about 150 pages.