nemobis ha recensito Ragazzi di vita di Pasolini P. Paolo
Review of 'Ragazzi di vita' on 'Goodreads'
Noioso... non l'ho finito, non riuscivo a procedere a una velocità decente.
Profilo utente
Questo collegamento si apre in una finestra pop-up
Libri di nemobis
Attività dell’utente
Feed RSS Indietro
nemobis ha recensito Il Piacere di Gabriele D'Annunzio
Review of 'Il Piacere' on 'Goodreads'
Orribile: pesantissimo e noiosissimo. Lo leggerò un'altra volta, perché leggere qualcosa di D'Annunzio è obbligatorio.
nemobis ha recensito Tess dei d'Urberville
Review of "Tess dei d'Urberville" on 'Goodreads'
Personalmente l'ho trovato abbastanza ben scritto ma troppo melodrammatico per i miei gusti (per non parlare delle fastidiose intromissioni didascaliche pseudo-dissacranti del narratore): vista la lunghezza, ho preferito interrompere e passare a letture piú piacevoli.
nemobis ha valutato Pierre et Gilles. Sailors & Sea: 4 stelle
nemobis ha recensito Parigi non finisce mai di Enrique Vila-Matas
Review of 'Parigi non finisce mai' on 'Goodreads'
Noioso: inutile proseguire, non è qualcosa che mi interessi; ho preso un granchio.
Review of 'Isagoge' on 'Goodreads'
2 stelle
Sostanzialmente una serie di definizioni. Probabilmente è inevitabile che sia interessante solo per gli specialisti.
nemobis ha recensito Cronache di guerra di George Orwell
Review of 'Cronache di guerra' on 'Goodreads'
Piuttosto noiose: sono proprio cronache cronache e anche censurate. Non finito.
nemobis ha recensito Racconti dei saggi taoisti di Pascal Fauliot
Review of 'Racconti dei saggi taoisti' on 'Goodreads'
Va bene, ho resistito per mesi ma dopo che ho cominciato ammetto che è vero: se ponete al libro una domanda assillante e lo aprite a caso, vi risponderà.
nemobis ha recensito Irish peacock & scarlet marquess di Merlin Holland
Review of 'Irish peacock & scarlet marquess' on 'Goodreads'
4 stelle
Err:510
nemobis ha valutato Needful Things: 4 stelle
Needful Things di Stephen King
“There are two prices for this. Half…and half. One half is cash. The other is a deed. Do you understand?” …
nemobis ha recensito A writer's diary di Virginia Woolf (Triad/Granada paperbacks)
Review of "A writer's diary" on 'Goodreads'
Non ho mai deciso che cosa pensare di questo libro. È Virginia, però vista attraverso la lente del marito. Non so quanto aggiunga veramente ai diari pubblicati in seguito.
nemobis ha recensito Gambling with Armageddon di Martin J. Sherwin
Review of 'Gambling with Armageddon' on 'Goodreads'
5 stelle
The real story behind the fiction of an orderly deployment of nuclear weapons, which is simply madness. We conveniently deceive ourselves into thinking that nuclear policy is no longer a threat to humanity, and can be separated from other evils like climate change, or that other issues should take priority. But how can we be so convinced that we'll make the best decisions about the nukes of today, when we've still not learnt our lessons from 1962?
«The real lesson of the Cuban missile crisis–the lesson that is consistently resisted because it marginalizes the value of nuclear weapons–is that nuclear armaments create ht eperils they are deployed to prevent, but are of little use in resolving them.»
nemobis ha recensito Outsider in the White House di Bernard Sanders
As Bernie Sanders continues to cement his reputation as hero to the progressive left with …
Review of 'Outsider in the White House' on 'Goodreads'
2 stelle
Nothing new here unless you've been living under a rock since 2015, but it's an interesting piece of political communications and a very easy read. It's not all fluff: we get to learn interesting details about a number of concrete policy issues you rarely hear about, like energy saving, from the point of view of what has already happened in legislation rather than vacuous promises.
nemobis ha recensito A colpi d'ascia. Un'irritazione
A colpi d'ascia. Un'irritazione
Review of "A colpi d'ascia. Un'irritazione" on 'Goodreads'
4 stelle
Le relazioni personali e romantiche e un mondo della cultura che dalle relazioni molto dipende.
nemobis ha recensito The open society and its enemies di Karl Popper
An open society provides its citizens with a mechanism for changing government; a closed society …
Review of 'The open society and its enemies' on 'Goodreads'
4 stelle
In this second volume, Popper puts to good use the concepts he developed in the first. I was a bit disappointed because we never get to learn a definition of this "open society", nor how to get there, but maybe that's the point. There is no single answer: Popper only shows us a method, which we need to learn by using it.
I've never had the patience to read Marx or Hegel in the original, and honestly I'm not sure one should, but I'm convinced Popper's analysis is one of the sharpest (at least for an empiricist point of view): it's brutal but also fair.
Every other page contains some insight that you may agree or disagree with, but remains useful food for thought for issues we're still facing some 80 years later, like the problem of NATO or climate change. Some of the concepts I've come to appreciate and …
In this second volume, Popper puts to good use the concepts he developed in the first. I was a bit disappointed because we never get to learn a definition of this "open society", nor how to get there, but maybe that's the point. There is no single answer: Popper only shows us a method, which we need to learn by using it.
I've never had the patience to read Marx or Hegel in the original, and honestly I'm not sure one should, but I'm convinced Popper's analysis is one of the sharpest (at least for an empiricist point of view): it's brutal but also fair.
Every other page contains some insight that you may agree or disagree with, but remains useful food for thought for issues we're still facing some 80 years later, like the problem of NATO or climate change. Some of the concepts I've come to appreciate and use in daily reflection are: the "mysticism" of any theory which proclaims a golden age to be either in the past or in the future; the untenable "psychological reductionism" which simplifies sociological constructs to the point of making them impossible to understand and govern.
A passage from chapter 23: «To sum up these considerations, it may be said that what we call "scientific objectivity" is not a product of the individual scientist's impartiality, but a product of the social or public character of the scientific method; and the individual scientist's impartiality is, so far as it exists, not the source but rather the result of this socially or institutionally organized objectivity of science».